考研英语真题阅读理解解析翻译
由于阅读在考研英语试卷中所占的分值最高，所以在考研英语圈子里一向有得阅读者得天下一说。下面就是 给大家整理的考研英语真题阅读理解解析翻译，希望对你有用!
考研英语阅读原文The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today.
The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.
"Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal," writes McNutt in an editorial.
Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors(SBoRE).
Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal's internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers.
The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.
Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said:
"The creation of the 'statistics board' was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Science's overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish."
Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group.
He says he expects the board to "play primarily an advisory role."
He agreed to join because he "found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact.
This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science."
John Ioannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is "a most welcome step forward" and "long overdue."
"Most journals are weak in statistical review, and this damages the quality of what they publish.
I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays, statistical review is more essential than expert review," he says.
But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.
Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research, according to David Vaux, a cell biologist.
Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2012, but journals should also take a tougher line, "engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process".
Vaux says that Science's idea to pass some papers to statisticians "has some merit,
but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify 'the papers that need scrutiny' in the first place".
考研英语阅读翻译总主编马西娅;麦克娜特今天宣布：《科学》杂志在同行评阅之外又增加一轮数据审查。
数据分析中出现的基本错误致使许多出版的研究发现不可再生得到广泛关注后，《科学》也随即效仿了其他杂志的做法。
“一定要让读者对我们出版的研究结论有信心，”麦克娜特在一篇专栏中写道。
该杂志与美国统计协会一道，任命七名专家成立了一个数据校对编辑委员会。
原稿将由杂志内部编辑，或已经成立的数据校对编辑委员会委员或外部同行校对员标注以供进一步的审查。
届时该委员会成员将物外部统计专家来审查这些原稿。
在被问及是否已有特殊的论文促成了这样的改变时，麦克娜特说:
“对科学研究领域的统计学应用和数据分析的广泛关注，促使了‘数据校对编辑委员会的成立’，该委员会成立也是全面提高我们出版的研究可再生性努力的一部分。”
乔瓦尼;帕尔米贾尼是哈佛大学公共卫生学院的生物统计学家、该委员会的成员。
他说他期望该委员会“能扮演最基本的顾问角”。
他同意加入是因为“他发现建立该委员会的眼光很新颖、独特，还可能会有持久的影响力。”
它影响到的不仅是《科学》杂志本身，而且可能影响到更多想要在《科学》杂志之后成为行业模范的出版社。editorial英文
约翰;伊奥尼迪斯，一名专攻研究方法论的物理学家，称这一政策是“最受欢迎的进步”却又“姗姗来迟。”
“数据审查是大多数杂志的薄弱环节，而这会损害出版物的质量。