二手房买卖合同纠纷答辩状
    Answer in English.
    1. Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction.
    The Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action because the Plaintiff has not alleged any facts that would give rise to a federal question. The Plaintiff's claims are based solely on state law, and there is no federal statute or treaty that creates a cause of action for the Plaintiff's claims.
    2. Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted.
    The Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because the Plaintiff has not alleged any facts that would entitle the Plaintiff to the relief requested. The Plaintiff's claims are based on speculation and conjecture, and the Plaintiff has not provided any evidence to support the Plaintiff's claims.
    3. Statute of Limitations.
    The Plaintiff's claims are barred by the statute of limitations. The Plaintiff's claims accrued more than two years before the Plaintiff filed this action, and the Plaintiff has not alleged any facts that would toll the statute of limitations.
    4. Waiver.
    The Plaintiff has waived the Plaintiff's claims by failing to assert the Plaintiff's claims in a timely manner. The Plaintiff knew or should have known about the Plaintiff's claims more than two years before the Plaintiff filed this action, and the Plaintiff has not provided any explanation for the Plaintiff's delay in asserting the Plaintiff's claims.
    5. Laches.
    The Plaintiff's claims are barred by laches. The Plaintiff has delayed in asserting the Plaintiff's claims for more than two years, and the Plaintiff's delay has prejudiced the Defendant. The Defendant has changed its position in reliance on the Plaintiff's delay, and the Defendant would be harmed if the Plaintiff were allowed to assert the Plaintiff's claims at this time.
defendant    6. Estoppel.
    The Plaintiff is estopped from asserting the Plaintiff's claims because the Plaintiff has made representations to the Defendant that are inconsistent with the Plaintiff's claims. The Plaintiff has represented to the Defendant that the Plaintiff would not assert the Plaintiff's claims, and the Defendant has relied on the Plaintiff's representations to the Defendant's detriment.
    Answer in Chinese.
    1.无管辖权。
    法院对本案无管辖权，因为原告没有提出任何事实足以引起联邦问题。原告的诉求完全基于州法律，也没有任何联邦法规或条约为原告的诉求创造诉因。
    2.未陈述可获得救济的诉求。
    原告未陈述可获得救济的诉求，因为原告未提出任何事实足以使原告有权获得所请求的救济。原告的诉求基于猜测和臆断，原告未提供任何证据支持原告的诉求。
    3.诉讼时效。
    原告的诉求受诉讼时效限制。原告的诉求在原告提起本诉讼前两年多才发生，并且原告未提出任何事实足以中止诉讼时效。
    4.放弃。
    原告因未及时主张其诉求而放弃其诉求。原告知道或应当在原告提起本诉讼前两年多知道原告的诉求，并且原告未提供任何解释说明原告延迟主张其诉求的原因。
    5.怠于起诉。
    原告的诉求因怠于起诉而受阻。原告已延迟主张其诉求两年多，并且原告的延迟已损害被告。被告已根据原告的延迟改变其立场，并且如果允许原告此时主张其诉求，被告将受到损害。
    6.禁止反言。
    原告被禁止主张其诉求，因为原告对被告作出了与其诉求不符的陈述。原告向被告表示原
告不会主张其诉求，并且被告依赖原告的陈述而使其自身利益受到损害。